Thursday, March 1, 2012

unit one


Kevin Lim
Leah Benedict English 201
2/9/12
                                                Differences from time periods and places
            With her roots directly coming from Taiwan, my mother moved to the United States when she was just 10 years old.  When she was a child her parents forced her to move due to their ambition to attain the American dream and become successful.  This had a toll on my mother as well though since she didn’t want to leave.  When I was a child she would always spout out the random facts about the food that she had back home and how it was so different from the food here.  However, being the child that I was I never took the time to listen or to even care.  This project gave me the opportunity to learn about my family’s past and culture and the types of foods that they used to eat on a daily basis.  I learned this with the online interview with my mother. 
            Throughout the interview my mother named all these kinds of foods that I have never even heard of.  Some of these foods were rice porridge, and many different kinds of soups.  There were also many common foods that I knew like fried rice dumplings and eggrolls.  However, the thing that really interested me was how they made their food.  She told me that ll of the ingredients used is all fresh with hardly any preservatives.  This shocked me because that would have to mean that the products must have a very short shelf life.  My mother confirmed this, and she also said that it was more “economical this way.  This process lets us not waste the food that we eat and also lets us appreciate the money used to get the food, the people who grew the food, and thank the animals which gave us our fill for the meal.”  This was the life that my mother had and she told me that it was one of the happiest times of her life. 
            However, her father suddenly decided to move to the states so being the family they must follow along.  My mother saw that after she had arrived in the states, she noticed the differences in how food is transported is already really different but also how they store the food was very foreign to her as well.  She saw vegetables like potatoes, lettuce and tomatoes were being sold in plastic bags and being sold in large quantities.  This was a real shock to her at first because she was thinking to herself how her family can finish that many pieces of food in a few days.  This shocked her until her mother told her that there many kinds of chemicals that can keep the food edible for a very long time.  At first my other was fascinated by this but that was until she tasted the food that her mother made.  She noticed that there was a different taste to it; there was an excess taste.  She tasted a sort of salty taste that wasn’t in the food before.  So she thought to herself that it was probably the ingredients since the way that her mother prepared the food hasn’t changed at all. 
            My mother also didn’t like how there were so many fast food restaurants that were open.  Her first meal in the states was actually in a fast food restaurant in the airport.  This disgusted her because she didn’t even like the taste of it at all.  She thought that the burger was “a softened hockey puck.” She tasted all kinds of salts which made the food itself taste good but she knew that the ingredients origins were not the same as it was back in Taiwan.  Even though she had these kinds of opinions she knew that there was nothing she could do about it.  She had to live a new life where food is not as fresh as it was and the way it is prepared can also be done in the matter of minutes due to technological advances.
            After a while of staying in the states my Grandfather’s business of selling jewelry and also his other business of owning a shoestore was skyrocketing and he playing the stock market also gave them a really good income.  He first bought a black and white TV so his family can get some entertainment.  This however led to my grandma watching a lot of cooking shows to improve her cooking skills and to expand her variety of what to make every night.  My grandma started to mimic the techniques being shown and started making more Americanized meals.  One time the children were so shocked not to see rice on the table but steak that was made medium rare and it was so tender that it melted in their mouths.  After the meal my grandmother asked what for the children’s thoughts about the food.  They said it was great but it still tasted like there were preservatives and they wouldn’t want to eat Americanized food every day.  My grandfather made a proposal to go buy organic foods; even if it’s more expensive.  He told them that even if the food is more expensive it has “no preservatives so it’s basically like the food back home.”  This also proved that Pollan has a point because my grandma was able to learn some new techniques just by watching and she was able to “expand her horizons.”
            The family decided to try the organic foods the next time they went to the market.  They picked up many kinds of vegetables.  They were glad that they weren’t sold in bulk like the other foods so they don’t have to waste as much and picked up some organic meat as well like fish and chicken.  They decided as soon as they got home that they would make their most favorite meal which was fried fish with corn sauce all over rice.  Back in Taiwan this was considered fast food but it takes a very long time to make.  The process of peeling the corn instead of opening a can to get the food was very refreshing to them.  It reminded them of the good times back home and the quality time spent on cooking.  After my grandfather came back from work they decided to have a nice family dinner.
            However my experiences with food have always been about how fast I can get my food and get on with my other activities.  I would always not even eat breakfast in the morning and just go to school because I overslept.  I guess things have definitely changed over the past 20 years since my mom came over from Taiwan.

notes on indiana jones clip


Snake surprise?
-eating snakes raw without cooking and
-eating bugs
-delicacy?
-eyeball soup?
-chilled monkey brains?
-uses the food as a more comedic tone to lighten up the already serious mood of the scene.
-of course would sympathize with the foreigners because they have not seen these kinds of “foods” before and for all they know it could have been poison.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Mythical world of anthropophagy

This piece by arens explains in his own way, how there is a connection between sex and eating.  It also implies a sort of cannibalism that in a very disturbing way. He also stated that many races decided that others were cannibals and that lead to many conflicts of warfare etc.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

assignment 4 final


Kevin Lim
Assignment 4 Rough Draft
The case against college
The general argument that is made by Dale Stephens from his work, "The case against college" is that college puts their students into major debt.  More specifically he writes that college is a very large investment that really doesn’t do much to make students successful in life.  In this passage he writes that “There are a little over nineteen million students going to college in the United State, each of whom are graduating with an average of $24,000 in debt, according to the nonprofit Institute for College Access & Success.”  In this passage he suggests that college really isn't necessary for people to succeed and it really does have many losses to the individual.
In conclusion dale Stephens' belief is that college puts people into debt and it truly isn't necessary in society.  He is definitely right that it does put some students into deep financial trouble but he is wrong when he states that it is not necessary.  Also, the real problem lies not in in the college years of a student, but the years before that, where children go through grade school.  That is the time frame of when the creativity of children is taking a turn for the worse.  More specifically I believe that it is almost impossible for someone to succeed in society without college.  For example, most employers today look for at least a 4 year degree before hiring anybody.  Although Dale Stephens might object that people need college, I maintain that it is definitely necessary in society for people to succeed.  Therefore I conclude that Stephens does speak some truth in his argument but also I see some flaws as well.  I believe that until “The case against college” gets more recognition; it is not truly possible for anyone to succeed by following this method.
Often times when a student graduates from college, they go through the same problems of debt.  There are many exceptions to this but unfortunately, this is the sad truth of it.  Dale Stephens states that college is the main cause of debt because of student loans and that it really isn’t necessary for someone to succeed in life.  I agree with him to an extent.  I definitely see the possibility of a graduate student to go into major debt because of college but I definitely cannot see the possibility of a person succeeding in life and making a good living without a four year degree at least!  Of course there are a few individuals who get very lucky like Bill Gates.  He was able to create one of the largest computer software companies, Microsoft, and he was a college dropout.  Throughout 1995 to 2006 he was the wealthiest man for his time.  Another successful individual is of course Steve Jobs, the co-founder of apple.  Jobs went to college for one semester who quit before he went to work for “Atari and then he worked for Pixar Animations before they merged with Disney.”  These two are one of the handfuls of people that were very lucky and were given the opportunity to be successful through lucky life choices and business propositions.  This does not apply to the general public; the majority of us are unable to get even the slightest opportunity to make a fraction of what these people make.  However, college gives us a chance to be able to attain this, with a proper education.  If we are able to do something extraordinary that people would acknowledge then we could have a chance to be like Bill Gates, Steve jobs, or Henry Ford.
Dale Stephens makes a very valid argument; this is especially true on the fact that school kills creativity.  Stephens explains tells us that there was an experiment that tested children about their creativity.  This test concluded that after a few years of children being in the normal education system, they were tested one more time to see what happened.  Originally most of the children tested at a very high level but after the education they received, only about half were able to test at the same ability as they had before.  Stephens states that college is the main cause about this but I do not believe that this is true.  I do not think that college is the main source of this crisis because according to the tests, children would have lost the creativity that they had in the beginning regardless because of the grade level schooling that they have received since childhood.
Of course there are many opinions about this topic, many might choose to go and believe in Dale Stephens’ words or maybe students would just acquire an education by traditional means like going to grade school then college.  However if people can see both sides wouldn’t that be ideal?  It is definitely true that college does cost a lot of money but what can most people do about it?  This traditional way of going to school has been going on for many years and most graduates are able to pay off the student loans that they have borrowed.  The problem is definitely on the solution of how to stop the educational system of killing the creativity of the next generations to come.  There could definitely be some sort of way to increase the creativity of children and that is to stop the fear of failing.  According to the test that was mentioned above, students lose their creativity because of them being rewarded for following directions.  This basically sets up a standard that determines whether a person passes or fails.  Children however should not have a fear of failing because that will stop them from producing ideas in the first place. Coach Joe Newton of York High School in Illinois says to not be” afraid to fail, and when you do? Keep on trying”  There is definitely a solution to this problem, this is to help the children have high levels of creativity which would then get them good grades in school which would finally reward them with better job opportunities and better lifestyles
Even though it is hard for us to help the older generation, it is still possible to educate the younger generation so that they can keep their creativity at its peak.  This however can be done with the help of both the teachers and the parents of the teachers.  Instead of classic lectures that teachers usually give, discussions in circles are better for optimizing ideas.  In a lecture the way to teach a student is just by telling them the information and material, but did the students really get all the information? However in a discussion, teachers can ask questions on how to apply the knowledge that they have just learned. They can also assess the students on the new information and make sure that they understand the material.  Parents are also able to do something for their children as well; this would definitely have to start off at a young age though.
Parents are able to nurture their children from birth, but sometimes there are better ways for them to maximize their creativity.  Simple things like drawing and painting are able to make a child think of ideas.  However some other things are like just simply exposing children to other different types of cultures and environments.  This would allow them to experience difference types of thinking’s and mindsets of others and it gives them more ways to deal with a certain problem. Children should also be given simple problems like being asked a question about something he or she saw throughout the day.  For example if a child were to say he saw a squirrel, the parent would ask what it was doing. Or why do you think it was running around like that? This would allow the child to think past the possibilities and to make up some ideas that seem probable to them.  However this also needs the participation of the parents because when they get the answer from the child, be patient with judgments.  Children are afraid of failure and when they see a possible negative reaction to their ideas then they would stop thinking of the possibilities.  One example of this is the school system which is really a straightforward way of teaching.  When having the child do something it is better for the parent to remind the child of the fun of the process like coloring to make a beautiful picture rather than to think of the finishing product.   A final concept that can decrease the creativity in a child is the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.  When a child does something, it is better for them to have intrinsic motivation because that is when they are able to do their best work.  This is different than extrinsic because they are not as motivated to do as well because there is no self-interest or satisfaction in it.  This definitely helps students when they are young children till high school but what would happen in college?
Colleges today all go through the same process of teaching; in a lecture hall with many students.  This however does not get the whole point across for the students that want to learn.  As previously stated before, discussions are better teaching strategies rather than having many students in a large lecture hall.  This does not allow the students to completely absorb the information or even to apply it to questions on tests or essays that are assigned.  However this can definitely be changed if classes are on a more discussion based class where students can gain more one on one attention.  This would allow them to be able to make do with the information being provided and help them really understand what is going on in their classes.
Clearly children do lose their creativity by going through the school system, but with the help of teachers and parents, it is possible for that to change.  Parents can help their children question the things around them and that would help them expand their ideas.  Definitely Dale Stephens is right about college putting students into major debt but it is not true that it would be hard to pay off or that it could be a major problem.  If students would honestly learn and work hard in school they will be able to pay off their loans in a reasonable amount of time because of the good job that they have acquired due to them earning a degree.


Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Assignment 4 so far

Kevin Lim
Assignment 4 Rough Draft
The case against college
The general argument that is made by dale Stephens from his work, "The case against college" is that college puts their students into major debt.  More specifically he writes that students do not need a college degree to be successful in life.  In this passage he writes that “Creativity is innate, the problem is that school kills creativity.  Our educational systems cultivate a mindset where children would be rewarded for following directions.”  In this passage he suggests that college really isn't necessary for people to succeed and it really does have many losses to the individual.
In conclusion dale Stephens' belief is that college puts people into debt and it truly isn't necessary in society.  He is definitely right that it does put some students into deep financial trouble but he is wrong when he states that it is not necessary.  Also, the real problem lies not in in the college years of a student, but the years before that, where children go through grade school.  That is the time frame of when the creativity of children is taking a turn for the worse.  More specifically i believe that it is almost impossible for someone to succeed in society without college.  For example, most employers today look for at least a 4 year degree before hiring anybody.  Although Dale Stephens might object that people need college, i maintain that it is definitely necessary in society for people to succeed.  Therefore I conclude that Stephens does speak some truth in his argument but also I see some flaws as well.  I believe that until “The case against college” gets more recognition; it is not truly possible for anyone to succeed by following this method.
Often times when a student graduates from college, they go through the same problems of debt.  There are many exceptions to this but unfortunately, this is the sad truth of it.  Sale Stephens states that college is the main cause of debt because of student loans and that it really isn’t necessary for someone to succeed in life.  I agree with him to an extent.  I definitely see the possibility of a graduate student to go into major debt because of college but I definitely cannot see the possibility of a person succeeding in life and making a good living without a four year degree at least!  Of course there are a few individuals who get very lucky like Bill Gates.  He was able to create one of the largest computer software companies, Microsoft, and he was a college dropout .  Throughout 1995 to 2006 he was the wealthiest man for his time.  Another successful individual is of course Steve Jobs, the co-founder of apple.  Jobs went to college for one semester who quit before he went to work for “Atari and then he worked for Pixar Animations before they merged with Disney.”  These two are one of the handful of people that were very lucky and were given the opportunity to be successful through lucky life choices and business propositions.  This does not apply to the general public, the majority of us are unable to get even the slightest opportunity to make a fraction of what these people make.  However, college gives us a chance to be able to attain this, with a proper education.  If we are able to do something extraordinary that people would acknowledge then we could have a chance to be like Bill Gates, Steve jobs, or Henry Ford. 
Dale Stephens makes a very valid argument, this is especially true on the fact that school kills creativity.  Stephens explains tells us that there was an experiment that tested children about their creativity.  This test concluded that after a few years of children being in the normal education system, they were tested one more time to see what happened.  Originally most of the children tested at a very high level but after the education they received, only about half were able to test at the same ability as they had before.  Stephens states that college is the main cause about this but I do not believe that this is true.  I do not think that college is the main source of this crisis because according to the tests, children would have lost the creativity that they had in the beginning regardless because of the grade level schooling that  they have received since childhood. 
Of course there are many opinions about this topic, many might choose to go and believe in Dale Stephens’ words or maybe students would just acquire an education by traditional means like going to grade school then college.  However if people can see both sides wouldn’t that be ideal?  It is definitely true that college does cost a lot of money but what can most people do about it?  This traditional way of going to school has been going on for many years and most graduates are able to pay off the student loans that they have borrowed.  The problem is definitely on the solution of how to stop the educational system of killing the creativity of the next generations to come.  A change in society is already very difficult to achieve and especially a change in the school system?  Changing years of traditional ways of teaching is definitely not an easy task.  Most prefer staying with the old because it is the easiest way to go and it requires less effort.  Change however is hard because it takes time to adjust. 

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Template #2

The case against college
The general arguement that is made by dale Stephens from his work, "the case against college" is that college puts their students into major debt.
More specifically he writes that students do not need a college degree to be successful in life.  In this passage he writes that __________________________.  In this passage he suggests that college really isn't necessary for people to succeed and it really does do more bad than good. 
In conclusion dale Stephens' belief is that college puts people into debt and it truly isn't necessary in society.  He is definitely right that it does put some students into deep financial trouble but he is wrong when he states that it is not necessary.  More specifically i believe that it is almost impossible for someone to succeed in society without college.  For example, most employers today look for atleast a 4 year degree before hiring anybody.
Although Dale stephens might object that people need college, i maintain that it is definitely necassary in society for people to succeed.
Therefore i conclude that, Dale Stephens is partially right with his passage, " The case against college"

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Essentialism

To me, essentialism is anything that has requirements that make up what they are.  This directly goes back to old times when Gestalt psychologists described that the whole is worth more than the sum of its parts.  Basically certain properties makes things what they are, for example, humans are made of organic matter that walks on two legs and speaks languages.  We can compare this to dogs who walk on four legs and see in black and white with no language.

Experience is something that we have gone through, like playing sports, we are not good at it the first time.  This happens because we cannot predict what is going to happen in the future.  However if this is done a second time then there will be a higher success rate because the person doing the action will have more ability to predict what will happen

I am not sure how to explain genre but in my own definition, i believe that it is how we want to look at things.  Genre could definitely mean a certain perspective because it allows different people to look at things in different ways.  For example, i could look at a situation in a very scientific approach but someone who is very innocent and child like could look at it in a very different way compared to me